Surviving the Squeeze: Emergency Medicine Billing Under Federal Scrutiny
Did you know that nearly half of all emergency care is uncompensated? Are you aware that one in five patients treated in the emergency department has no insurance or clear method of reimbursement? These CMS statistics along with many more from the American College of Emergency Physicians were the starting point for an in-depth discussion about surprise medical billing with HealthLeaders magazine during the Healthcare Financial Management Association’s 2019 Annual Conference. Here are a few other important emergency department challenges discussed during the conference sessions:
- The volume of ED visits is up, but revenues are down as payers continue to curtail coverage.
- Patient deductibles and out-of-pocket costs have climbed, increasing the number of self-pay and under-insured accounts.
- ED encounters are first in the claims cycle, multiplying the likelihood of patient as the No. 1 payer.
- The majority of hospitals contract with a third party to employ and manage emergency physicians, disproportionately expanding the number of surprise medical bills for out-of-network (OON) emergency care (also called balance billing for ED providers).
EDs are under immense pressure and national scrutiny. Considering uncompensated care, uninsured patients, federal mandates to reduce surprise medical billing and the four reimbursement challenges mentioned above, times are tough. And they’re getting more difficult as surprise billing and the practice of balance billing for OON emergency care comes under governmental attack.
A Sticky State of Affairs for EDs
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) governs emergency physicians’ choices regarding patient care and treatment. All patients are seen regardless of insurance coverage or in-network affiliation. Turning patients away is never an option. However, since most EDs in the US are staffed by third-party clinicians who may or may not be in network for a patient’s insurance coverage, billing patients for out-of-network (OON) balances and subsequent surprise medical bills are common.
Furthermore, in emergency situations, patients and their families don’t pause and check insurance coverage before seeking immediate care—they simply show up and must be treated. The American College of Emergency Physicians provides an informative fact sheet to unravel the complexities.
Many constituents are trying to solve the emergency billing conundrum, and the federal government is the latest to enter the quandary. Here’s the latest news from the ongoing dispute.
Ongoing Debates Ensue
As of this blog post, Congress and the Senate are on recess and no further legislative action will occur until September. Modern Healthcare and the Emergency Department Practice Management Association (EDPMA) both provide timely updates and summary reports. Here is an overview of the information shared by Modern Healthcare on July 17, 2019:
The House Energy and Commerce Committee released a proposal to the Congress on May 2019 to ban surprise medical bills. The Committee’s proposal capped pay for OON treatment through a benchmark rate tied to median insurance rates. Since the Committee’s announcement, many amendments and lobbying efforts have been underway. The pace of new legislation coming out of Capital Hill on this topic is dizzying with the Senate health committee already approving its own legislative package that includes a ban on surprise bills. Here are several of the amendments to the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s proposal being discussed.
- Option for doctors to appeal to an independent arbiter to collect additional money for certain OON treatment and in cases with extenuating circumstances
- Potential increase for OON care at more expensive facilities
- Authorization for dispute resolution with insurers as long as the median in-network pay amount is higher than $1,250 and relates to a complex case
- Payment backstops based on charges rather than negotiated insurance rates
- Government Accountability Office study to monitor rural and under-served communities to ensure any ban on surprise medical bills doesn’t drive out rural doctors
- Network adequacy rules for insurers so providers don’t lose negotiating leverage
The amendment proposing an arbitration option for providers seems to have garnered the greatest push-back from lobbyists and patient advocacy groups. Apparently the next step involves constructing strong limitations around the scope of arbitration to mitigate any adverse consequences. With legislators out on summer recess, no further action on surprise medical billing is expected until September, as mentioned above.
This article was originally published on AR Boost formerly Payor Logic and is republished here with permission.